Let The Crowd Decide

Description

Put 3 versions of your message, tagline, or concept in front of 40 AI-powered personas — built from real demographic data — and find out which one wins. Choose what to evaluate them on: most appealing, convincing, memorable, trustworthy, or innovative. Filter by age and gender to target your audience. Get back a clear winner with vote distribution, reasoning, and demographic breakdown.

Core Capabilities

• Compare exactly 3 statements with 40 virtual voters
• Evaluate on specific criteria: appealing, convincing, memorable, trustworthy, or innovative
• Filter voters by age range (18-99) and gender (male/female/all)
• Generate vote distribution with winner analysis, top reasons, and demographic breakdown

Good Query Examples

• "Sustainable fashion for the modern consumer" / "Eco-friendly clothing that makes a difference" / "Style with purpose — wear the change" (criteria: appealing, gender: All, age: 25-45)
• "Your data, your rules" / "Privacy without compromise" / "Security meets simplicity" (criteria: trustworthy, gender: All, age: 30-55)
• "[Your brand] — made for every day" / "[Your brand] — built to last" / "[Your brand] — designed for you" (criteria: memorable, gender: female, age: 20-40)

Bad Query Examples

• "Which tagline is better: A or B?" → This agent requires exactly 3 statements. Fix: Add a third option, or use Ask the Crowd: Opinion to get qualitative feedback on fewer options.
• "What do people think about our new slogan?" → This asks for open-ended opinions, not a comparison. Fix: Use Ask the Crowd: Opinion for detailed written feedback on a single statement.
• "Rate how much people agree with 'AI will replace jobs'" → This asks for an agreement score, not a comparison between options. Fix: Use Ask the Crowd: Survey for 1-5 Likert scale ratings.
• "Which brand has better market share: Nike or Adidas?" → This asks for factual data, not a crowd evaluation. Fix: Use Statista for market research data.

Use-Case Ideas

• Compare tagline variations for a brand campaign
• Test product positioning statements with a target audience
• Evaluate trust signals in B2B messaging
• Find the most memorable slogan among finalists
• Benchmark creative concepts on innovation appeal

Limitations

• Exactly 3 statements required (no more, no fewer)
• Fixed sample size of 40 personas (not configurable)
• Responses are AI-generated from synthetic panel data, not real human responses
• Data freshness depends on panel updates, not real-time collection
• Each statement must be 5-300 characters
• Age range limited to 18-99

Input/Output Spec

Input:

• statement1 (required): First option to compare (5-300 chars)
• statement2 (required): Second option to compare (5-300 chars)
• statement3 (required): Third option to compare (5-300 chars)
• evaluation_criteria (optional): "appealing", "convincing", "memorable", "trustworthy", or "innovative" (default: "appealing")
• gender (optional): "All", "Man", or "Woman" (default: "All")
• min_age (optional): Minimum age 18-99 (default: 25)
• max_age (optional): Maximum age 18-99 (default: 65)

Output:

• Markdown report with:
• Winner announcement with vote share and margin
• Vote distribution across all 3 options
• Top reasons voters chose each option
• Demographic breakdown of votes
• Confidence level assessment
• Actionable recommendations

Disambiguation Signals

• Choose Let the Crowd Decide over Opinion when: you need a winner among 3 options, not detailed written feedback
• Choose Let the Crowd Decide over Survey when: comparing 3 statements against each other, not rating agreement with a single statement
• Choose Opinion over Let the Crowd Decide when: you need written reasoning, not just vote counts
• Choose Survey over Let the Crowd Decide when: measuring agreement level (1-5) with one statement